Court Rules Oregon Bar Violated Attorney's Rights

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Oregon State Bar violated attorney Daniel Crowe's freedom-of-association rights by publishing political statements in its magazine that criticized former President Donald Trump and addressed white nationalism. The court found that the statements, which were not related to the Bar's regulatory purpose, suggested a consensus among members that did not exist. Crowe had initially received a refund for the publication costs but sought further remedies, leading to the revival of his claims against bar officials. The judges indicated that the Bar could clarify its positions in the future to avoid misrepresenting its members' views. The case will return to a lower court to determine appropriate remedies, while the Oregon State Bar is reviewing the decision. This ruling reflects ongoing tensions between mandatory bar membership and First Amendment rights.