Copyright Case Against AI Art Generators Advances
Copyright Case Against AI Art Generators Advances
Copyright Case Against AI Art Generators Advances
News summary

A federal judge has allowed copyright claims from artists against AI companies, including Stability AI and Midjourney, to proceed to discovery, marking a significant development in a class action lawsuit regarding the unauthorized use of their artwork in AI training. U.S. District Judge William Orrick found that the allegations suggest Stable Diffusion may have been designed to facilitate copyright infringement. While some claims were dismissed, the survival of key copyright and trademark claims indicates potential implications for AI companies that use copyrighted material. The artists argue that their work was used without consent, and they seek to uncover how these companies trained their AI systems. The outcome of this case could influence the future of AI in creative industries, as legal precedents are established regarding the usage of copyrighted material. The ruling highlights ongoing tensions between traditional artists and emerging AI technologies.

Story Coverage
Artists' lawsuit against generative AI makers can go forward, judge says
alt
Reuters
Center
AI companies lose bid to dismiss parts of visual artists' copyright case
Bias Distribution
50% Left
Information Sources
51dae2ab-6a3f-4156-b4a8-805de03e2b50a3544a73-dab3-486d-ae75-bd4d15f01f55
Left 50%
Center 50%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
2
Left
1
Center
1
Right
0
Unrated
0
Last Updated
35 days ago
Bias Distribution
50% Left
Related News
AI Assistant
Story Coverage
Artists' lawsuit against generative AI makers can go forward, judge says
alt
Reuters
Center
AI companies lose bid to dismiss parts of visual artists' copyright case

Related Topics

Subscribe

Stay in the Know, Subscribe to Our News

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News