A federal court in Boston upheld Massachusetts' Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act, which bans the sale of pork from pigs kept in confinement that does not meet specific space requirements. The ruling dismissed challenges from Missouri-based Triumph Foods and other out-of-state pork producers, affirming that the state law does not conflict with the Federal Meat Inspection Act, as it only prohibits the sale of non-compliant pork without regulating slaughterhouse operations. Judge William G. Young clarified that slaughterhouses can still function as before, provided they can identify legally compliant meat. Question 3, the law in question, was passed by 77% of voters in 2016 and reflects a growing consumer demand for humane treatment in food production. This ruling may encourage other states to adopt similar animal welfare measures, prompting significant changes in the pork industry. The decision highlights the increasing importance of ethical farming practices and could influence market dynamics.