Ninth Circuit Rules Uber Owes Duty of Care to Drivers
Ninth Circuit Rules Uber Owes Duty of Care to Drivers
Ninth Circuit Rules Uber Owes Duty of Care to Drivers
News summary

A divided panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Uber owes a 'duty of care' to its drivers under Washington law, particularly in the case of Cherno Ceesay, who was murdered by two passengers in a botched carjacking in December 2020. The court found that Uber maintained significant control over the rider-driver matching process, which established a 'special relationship' akin to that of employer and employee. This decision overturns a previous ruling that had dismissed the family's wrongful death lawsuit against Uber, which claimed the company failed to implement safety measures despite knowing drivers faced risks from violent passengers. The dissenting judge expressed concerns that this ruling could lead to broader implications for the gig economy. The case now returns to the lower courts for further proceedings, with Ceesay's family expressing hope for justice. Uber has not yet commented on the ruling.

Story Coverage
Appeals Court Rules Uber Had Duty to Ensure Safety of Driver Killed by Passengers
Bias Distribution
100% Right
Information Sources
37a048d0-d1c3-4045-a275-fea6b8818300
Right 100%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
1
Left
0
Center
0
Right
1
Unrated
0
Last Updated
19 days ago
Bias Distribution
100% Right
Related News
AI Assistant
Story Coverage
Appeals Court Rules Uber Had Duty to Ensure Safety of Driver Killed by Passengers

Related Topics

Subscribe

Stay in the Know, Subscribe to Our News

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News