Supreme Court ruling on immunity
Supreme Court ruling on immunity

Supreme Court ruling on immunity

News summary

The Supreme Court recently ruled that former presidents, including Donald Trump, have absolute immunity for official acts, but not for unofficial ones, affecting ongoing legal proceedings against Trump related to his alleged election interference. This ruling has been sent back to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for further consideration. In response, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced the 'No Kings Act', aiming to limit the Supreme Court's authority over presidential immunity cases, asserting that Congress should dictate the applicability of federal laws to presidents. Schumer's legislation seeks to counter the Supreme Court's July decision, which has drawn criticism for potentially undermining democratic principles. Additionally, a constitutional amendment proposed by Rep. Joseph Morelle reinforces the notion that no individual is above the law, reflecting widespread concern regarding the Court's ruling and its implications. President Biden has also called for reforms, including term limits and an ethics code for justices, amid dwindling public confidence in the Court.

Story Coverage
Bias Distribution
100% Center
Information Sources
27aa3b97-dde4-4264-bee6-0c66d3641e74
Center 100%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
2
Left
0
Center
1
Right
0
Unrated
1
Last Updated
109 days ago
Bias Distribution
100% Center

Open Story Timeline

Story timeline 1Story timeline 2Story timeline 3Story timeline 4Story timeline 5Story timeline 6Story timeline 7Story timeline 8Story timeline 9Story timeline 10Story timeline 11Story timeline 12Story timeline 13Story timeline 14

Analyze and predict the
development of events

Related News
Ask VT AI
Story Coverage

Related Topics

Subscribe

Stay in the know

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News