California's SB 1047, aimed at regulating large-scale AI models costing over $100 million, has sparked significant debate among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill establishes essential safety protocols to mitigate risks such as cyberattacks, misinformation, and misuse by malicious actors, ensuring AI development benefits society without compromising security. Supporters also highlight the bill’s alignment with existing voluntary commitments from leading AI companies. However, critics, including prominent tech figures and Silicon Valley investors, argue it could stifle innovation, particularly harming startups and open-source development by imposing heavy compliance burdens and potential liabilities. The bill’s requirement for annual third-party audits and the creation of a Frontier Model Division for oversight has further fueled opposition. The bill is set to proceed to the Assembly floor for a vote, with significant implications for the future of AI regulation in California.