Kamala Harris recently announced a plan for a federal ban on 'price gouging' in the food industry, a move met with skepticism from legal and economic experts who warn of its complexity and potential unintended consequences. Critics argue that Harris's proposal revives outdated economic concepts reminiscent of the 1970s stagflation era, where price controls proved ineffective. Currently, price gouging laws exist in 37 states, but they often apply only during emergencies, raising questions about the scope and clarity of Harris's plan. Experts note that without a clear definition of price gouging, the policy could lead to confusion and misinterpretation. Economists generally view government-imposed price controls negatively, citing historical evidence of their failure to address inflation effectively. The discourse surrounding this proposal highlights a broader trend in U.S. politics where old, ineffective ideas resurface repeatedly.