Appeals Court Rules Against California Child Safety Law
Appeals Court Rules Against California Child Safety Law

Appeals Court Rules Against California Child Safety Law

News summary

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that key provisions of California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act likely violate the First Amendment, specifically criticizing its requirement for companies to assess and report potential online harms to children. The court found that this requirement could compel speech and effectively make businesses 'censors' of content deemed harmful. Although the law aims to protect children by enforcing stricter privacy settings and data collection practices, the judges suggested that California could use less restrictive means to achieve its goals, such as education and voluntary content filtering. The ruling follows a preliminary injunction that blocked parts of the law, with the court affirming some prohibitions while leaving other provisions open for reconsideration. Critics, including the trade group NetChoice, argue that such regulations stifle free speech and impose undue burdens on tech companies. The case highlights ongoing legal debates over child protection laws in the digital age.

Story Coverage
Bias Distribution
60% Left
Information Sources
b5604fbc-eed1-463f-8ea7-72fed5b9d859bfb2a97b-336e-48d9-b69a-147df7862dc2a3544a73-dab3-486d-ae75-bd4d15f01f55
+1
Left 60%
Center 20%
Right 20%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
6
Left
3
Center
1
Right
1
Unrated
1
Last Updated
95 days ago
Bias Distribution
60% Left
Related News
Ask VT AI
Story Coverage
Subscribe

Stay in the know

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News