Supreme Court Limits SEC and Marriage Rights
Supreme Court Limits SEC and Marriage Rights

Supreme Court Limits SEC and Marriage Rights

News summary

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the SEC must bring cases seeking civil penalties for securities fraud to federal court for a jury trial, invoking the Seventh Amendment. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a strong dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, criticized the majority for disrupting the balance of powers and ignoring precedent. This ruling dismantles part of the Dodd-Frank Act, which allowed SEC administrative proceedings for such penalties. In another 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that U.S. citizens do not have a fundamental liberty interest in their noncitizen spouses being admitted to the country, sparking further dissent from Sotomayor who warned of threats to marriage rights. Sotomayor's dissent in both cases underscores a growing ideological rift within the Court, highlighting concerns over individual rights and separation of powers.

Story Coverage
Bias Distribution
40% Left
Information Sources
09bc43f5-e425-4ffd-980d-14d8f4a28792a8525413-d1cb-4a36-b99e-5987ae74bd31cad3d7a8-9ce2-4060-a6fb-3964c8b50089d387b58c-602b-49e7-8f0e-990aad2baa47
+11
Left 40%
Center 33%
Right 27%
Coverage Details
Total News Sources
16
Left
6
Center
5
Right
4
Unrated
1
Last Updated
108 days ago
Bias Distribution
40% Left

Open Story Timeline

Story timeline 1Story timeline 2Story timeline 3Story timeline 4Story timeline 5Story timeline 6Story timeline 7Story timeline 8Story timeline 9Story timeline 10Story timeline 11Story timeline 12Story timeline 13Story timeline 14

Analyze and predict the
development of events

Related News
Ask VT AI
Story Coverage
Subscribe

Stay in the know

Get the latest news, exclusive insights, and curated content delivered straight to your inbox.

Related News
Recommended News